REad my Signature and Discuss.

[Bad Wane]

IF you have no religious views; or feel uncomfortable talking about it, do not respond, and sorry if I offend you. But I have had this Signature for a while and receive private messages every so often asking me about it. So Lets Talk.

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God.

- Epicurus

[Akron Boy 32]

I don't know half the words in your sig or know what they mean so I couldnt discuss lol

PSN- AKRONBOY32

[chrisc2006]

Never seen you play. Are you really a rocket catch user? Nice man

Originally Posted by Xv BiBleMaN vX

try understanding football better .....

honestly how do you expect someone to answer this? obviously you don't want to have 12 guys in the box and also not 12 guys out of the box ... somewhere in the middle lies people's opinions of how you should play ....

[Bad Wane]

Originally Posted by Akron Boy 32

I don't know half the words in your sig or know what they mean so I couldnt discuss lol

Google. That's how I found the different meanings. lolz

Originally Posted by chrisc2006

Never seen you play. Are you really a rocket catch user? Nice man

I rocket Catch when the corner-back is playing the appropriate zones to get RC'd on. This year there are so many other routes you can exploit against man or zone that the RC is now my bail out route; where as last year it was my every other play route lolz.

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God.

- Epicurus

[Dilloooo]

LOL @ having to google the meaning of your sig before you put it in your sig. SMH

Madden '11

Comepete4Ever Season 1:


www.compete4ever.com

[rook85]

I understand what he is saying but I disagree with the tone and what he is implying. Evil is in the world because sin is in the world, and evil doesn't just exist, people commit evil acts (I am not saying that evil acts solely make up evil, just giving a specific example for the sake of the argument). So to imply that God should prevent evil is to imply that God should take away everyone's freewill. People make conscious decisions to commit evil acts. One of the greatest ways that God shows his love to us, is to allow us to have freewill.

So with that said... I believe that the author should reverse the focus of the statement from God and focus it on the true origin.

R.I.P. 21





AIM: Rookboy85
PSN: ROOK85

---

Last edited by rook85; 04-02-2010 at 01:05 AM.

[koampapapa]

i disagree, but i'm not offended.

Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.

because that logic isn't true.

that's like saying if something isn't good, it's bad.

if something doesn't stop evil when it can, then it promotes evilness. that's what it's saying. and that's not true.

EAFL-PS3 Co-Commissioner

EAFL Record: 173-97 (including 10-7 playoff)
18 seasons, 2 SB Rings, 9 playoff appearances.
EAFL PS3 - Season XIX - New York Giants - 10-6
TEAM GRYFFINDOR
Trophy King Madden 2010

[Jerms]

philosophy 101 lol

^^^ Props To Joeamania

EAFL PS3 (Season 16 Super Bowl Champion)

WGG
Jerms
Drewmetal
MJ
LZ

[hutchin sent]

It's your typical free thinker rambling.Almost gibberish.I get what he is saying but whats the point.Better yet whats your point.The good ol' tell of Noah and the ark can clear that up (if you do believe in god).According to the Bible God himself killed the most people.So with that said that sig does not hold water.Sorry if I offended you.

---

Last edited by hutchin sent; 04-03-2010 at 02:59 PM.

[Real 3hundred]

Originally Posted by rook85

I understand what he is saying but I disagree with the tone and what he is implying. Evil is in the world because sin is in the world, and evil doesn't just exist, people commit evil acts (I am not saying that evil acts solely make up evil, just giving a specific example for the sake of the argument). So to imply that God should prevent evil is to imply that God should take away everyone's freewill. People make conscious decisions to commit evil acts. One of the greatest ways that God shows his love to us, is to allow us to have freewill.

So with that said... I believe that the author should reverse the focus of the statement from God and focus it on the true origin.

Thats some deep ****.

EAFL E-2 Season 12 Superbowl Champion